Couple of years back or we can say in early nineties it was something that software development can be done with a Software development Company solely at one place. Now it is changed and different teams are working from different places on entire projects and never meet face-to-face. The fact that is still challenging is that it hasn’t reduced the risk and complexity involved in successful project delivery in spite of reducing the frequent-flyer balance of today’s developers.

Global development and delivery (GDD) is most fascinating short tem aspect that is consistently keeping management to think of the same. Companies in software development using GDD as a competitive variable; most IT organizations know what benefits to expect from GDD. They usually are less sure about how to achieve them. Still, that hasn’t affected the speed of GDD adoption. Frequently, software development demands force IT organizations to take on GDD before they can establish strategies and platforms for success.

As the scope and scale of GDD efforts increase, so does the occurrence of failure. This pattern continues until frustration results in software development organizations concluding that GDD is more trouble than it’s worth. Software development has always been a team sport geographical & organizational separations of project Software development Company increases the complexity involved in achieving successful outcomes. Yet global flexibility is the core foundation for achieving advantages in cost, time, and quality. To be successful in GDD, you must protect the Software development Company aspect of application development outsourcing.

Well structured software development process framework gives GDD projects with Software development Company cohesion and direction without sacrificing the flexibility necessary for agile development. This help teams to adopt a single, “common” process for all projects and provides teams with the ability to adopt methods and best practices that are visible, practical, and governed. The platform ties global teams together and reduces the risk of failure as global development initiatives become more complex. With a global process framework, you can easily codify lessons learned and achieve continuous global process improvement.

For example, in defining and implementing a software development project specification, there is a tendency to believe that the more detailed and precise the specification is, the better the expected results from offshore software Development Company. However, in practice, wasting collaboration and communication time between distributed teams on the clarification of unnecessary implementation specifics and style contribute little to meeting the requirements of the end product. Implementation style is difficult to direct across GDD teams. Global methods and process should focus energy on managing and communicating the architecture and requirements. It shouldn’t waste time defining the step-by-step directions for how distributed Software development Company members should do their jobs.